Dominatrix Emerita
Tuesday, June 8th, 2010In academe, publishing a book is certainly grounds for congratulations—it’s a boon to any teaching career, a big step toward the goal of all of us adjuncts: to land a full-time professorship, and the time it affords to create our own work. My writing and teaching careers have so far gone according to plan: graduate school, adjuncting, publishing a book, and now pursuing the full-time gig in earnest. Only my original plan didn’t include publishing a book about the most personal and shocking experiences of my life.
While I don’t regret having been a dominatrix or a heroin addict—I emerged on the other side of both with a greater understanding and compassion for myself and other people—I never intended to write about those experiences. When that story of my past hijacked my creative energies I was in graduate school, knee-deep in a novel. On a whim, I had taken a survey course in nonfiction. After book reviews and op-eds, we arrived at memoir. The piece I wrote, about having been a dominatrix, was simultaneously one of the easiest and most difficult I’d ever written. It bubbled forth with the urgency of a story that wants to be told. But I knew it wouldn’t be worth writing with anything less than total honesty. I didn’t want to write a sensationalized account; I wanted to understand the personal transformation I had gone through as well as its universality. But these were not experiences that I had ever planned to share in detail with, well, anyone. Still, when my professor demanded that I abandon my current project and write this book, I knew the advice was sound. So, after having a small heart attack, I wrote it.
I am proud of the book. I did my best to practice what I teach: to merge honesty and experience with careful craft. Nonetheless, the book is full of everything no one ever wants her family to know about her past—or her students, let alone her boss, or potential boss. The material of my book is not the stuff of job interviews.
Like most realistic writers, I expected the book to be received with resounding silence. On some level I hoped, unrealistically, that I would be able to reap the benefits of being a published author without having to confront the vulnerable position that my subject matter put me in. And so, when I was scheduled for an interview on Fresh Air with Terry Gross, and featured on the front page of the New York Post, I was thrilled, but also terrified.
The week after I appeared in the Post, my boss congratulated me at a faculty meeting. “Thank you,” I replied, smiling, but my heart raced. I quickly brought the subject back to grading rubrics.
My colleagues knew that I had a book coming out, but I hadn’t broached its subject directly with anyone I didn’t also consider a friend. In fact, I haven’t yet—now more than two months after the book’s release. I’m embarrassed by my own meekness, but equally embarrassed by the prospect of discussing my past with colleagues. Before my mother read Whip Smart, she asked me to divulge the most intense parts so that she wouldn’t cringe in anticipation while reading. “Mom!,” I half joked. “I wrote it down because I couldn’t say these things aloud.” I had made a decision at the outset to write the book in a vacuum because I knew that if I let myself imagine others’ reactions, I’d never finish it.
My own trepidation is surprising on some level; it’s incongruent with certain long-held self-perceptions. But so many of my self-perceptions have been upturned throughout the process of writing and publishing this book.
I’d always been drawn to extremes, to ways of living outside social prescription. Before writing the book, I would have named my rebellious nature and anthropological curiosity as primary motives for ending up in the “dungeon.” But my motives, like the job itself, were not what I had imagined. The iconic image associated with the word dominatrix—a dominant, self-possessed woman—is somewhat based in truth. However, it is a job that entails embodying the fantasies of other people, transforming oneself into a specified object of desire. It requires the ability, and on some level the desire, to conform to what others want from you, and a need to be desired. Admitting that I have those qualities makes me feel much more vulnerable than admitting that I have a rebellious streak.
Though loath to face it, I care what other people think—my family, my colleagues, and of course, my potential employers. While I privately relish embodying contrasts—I’m a high-school dropout with a graduate degree, a college professor covered in tattoos, a former heroin addict who hasn’t had a drink in seven years—these are not facts I advertise in my classrooms, or on job interviews. And I’m not immune to shame. I may not regret any of my decisions, but neither am I proud of them all.
As much as I’ve always been drawn to dark undersides, I also always wanted to teach. The only thing I’ve wanted longer is to be a writer. My desire to absorb—knowledge, experience, the kinds of education that happen both in and out of classrooms—is matched by a desire to give out as much as I take in. That, I think, suits me to the jobs of writer, teacher, and even sex worker. They aren’t as disparate as you might think.
Although it is part of the sex industry, the job of dominatrix doesn’t include sex. Perhaps for that reason, it is especially dynamic work: equal parts performer, therapist, and personal coach. I’ve heard teachers describe their jobs similarly. As in teaching, you get as much as you give. I brought a tremendous amount of energy into my “sessions,” and when my ability to do that waned, I stopped being able to perform my job. Now I try to bring a lot of energy into my classrooms, and because I believe in what I teach, my reserves are deeper.
At the crux of my pedagogical philosophy is honesty—about the difficulty and compromise inherent in the writing life, the outlandish tenacity it requires, and the transcendence possible. But the challenge of adding to that list honesty about who I am has called my philosophy to task. I often talk to my students about writing as a series of risks. Now that I’ve taken what may turn out to be the most terrifying risk of my career, I’m doing my best to land gracefully—to avoid injury, but also to prove, to my students and to myself, that it’s worth it.
I’m often asked if I think the subject matter of my book will inhibit my chances of landing a full-time faculty position. I worry, yes, but know it’s beyond my control. For better or worse, I cannot isolate my experience as a human being from my work. Increasingly, I don’t want to. I’ve learned that it doesn’t serve me as a writer to view any experience as “good” or “bad” or beyond examination. As my belief in the acceptability of my embodiment of seemingly contrasting traits deepens, my instinct to hide them wanes.
For the most part, my job hasn’t changed since the book came out. My students don’t often bring it up in class. I’m grateful for that. But they do approach me after class sometimes—young women mostly—thrusting their copy of the book onto my desk. I always smile, though my heart races, as they thank me for my honesty.